Lagos CBT Centre Owners Disassociate Selves from National Body

Computer-Based Test (CBT) Centre owners in Lagos State have disassociated themselves from a purported national body, the Computer-Based Test Centres Proprietors’ Association of Nigeria (CPAN).
This followed a report by a national daily, which quoted CPAN as stating that the failure of biometric and browsers provided by the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) for the 2019 Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME) was responsible for the inability of some candidates to sit for the examination.

Describing CPAN’s statement as offensive, condemnable and aimed at discrediting JAMB, a CBT owner, Alexander Ogedengbe, who spoke on behalf of CBT centre operators in Lagos, alleged that the professed national body had short-changed the system at some point.

Ogedengbe, who alleged further that through investigations, it has been established that the person who addressed the media on behalf of CBT centre owners in Nigeria, during which he made the above declaration, does not own a CBT centre.
“To say that they represent CBT centres in Nigeria whereby they do not have CBT centres is an affront.”

Ogedengbe added: “It’s unfortunate that this same person together with a group of persons whose centres were delisted by JAMB as a result of technical deficiency of their centres or examination malpractices will now stand as arbiters to judge JAMB’s competency visa viz UTME examination conduct.
“We hereby state categorically that we the CBT operators in Lagos State are neither part of the group nor aware of the conference where statement was made and hence disassociate ourselves entirely from the publication.

“To be very specific on the issues raised, the biometric of the candidates on the conduct of 2019 UTME examination. We cannot even remember any candidate that didn’t write the examination because of biometric failure.”“To our knowledge, the rule of biometric was very clear as stipulated by the JAMB examination board. Any candidate who cannot be captured directly by the biometric scanning machine, JAMB provided alternative for the candidate to write the examination and according to JAMB, such a case, including the details of the candidate should be reported to the board immediately. According to instruction from JAMB, a date will be scheduled for such candidates for the examination,” he said.

He explained: “Moreover, we the CBT operators have no jurisdiction over the biometric of the candidates. The officers charged with these responsibilities to our own knowledge discharge their duties reasonably.”

Revealing that another issues raised has to do with the examination browsers, Ogedengbe said: “According to JAMB, the security of the examination is paramount to the board hence they have the right to decide and deploy the type of browser needed to achieve their objective.”

“The board sent information to all the centres to delete the old browsers and download a new browser meant for the 2019 examination. The challenges arose at the centres that didn’t comply with this instruction or where the specifications of the system were not met.

“It is true that the time given to us to deploy this browser was short, but the board explained that the decision for the short notice also has to do with the security of the examination. We accepted the explanations because the security of the examination is also paramount to us in Lagos,” he added.

On examination malpractices, he said, “this act is alien to us in Lagos; we dataset it and refuse to be identified with it. This singular objective of conducting the examination free of any kind of examination malpractice has been the major objective of Prof. Ishaq Oloyede and his board since he was appointed the registrar of JAMB.

To be honest, this man and his staff have performed very well. He brought sanity to the examination. Truth must be told, we in Lagos have not witnessed any act by the board to compromise the examination, same way we in Lagos have strived hard to ensure that we are also 100 per cent aligned with the objective of the board.”