CONTAINING THE BLOODBATH IN BENUE

Carl Umegboro writes that Samuel Ortom should pursue peaceful measures to secure the peace

The killings in Benue State must not continue unabated. The incessant massacres and destruction of possessions, be it ethnic, religious or politically-motivated must stop. Human lives cannot continue to be wasted. Many families have lost loved ones including parents and innocent children to these heinous crimes against humanity.

Over time, Benue State governor, Samuel Ortom has always criticised President Muhammadu Buhari on account of the herdsmen who are mostly of Fulani stock, the president’s ethnic nationality. Observably, these have become the governor’s visible actions to the endless violent disturbances. Meanwhile, the helpless people under his watch are on regular basis butchered or gunned down by their rivals. The negligence leaves much to be desired.

Measuring from Section 14(2)(b) of the 1999 Constitution as amended, which provides that “the security and welfare of the people shall be the primary purpose of government”, the governor has failed in his duties to protect lives and property in his domain. A leader must be proactive. There’s no strong excuse that can justify the endless horrible scenes in Benue. Propagandas can wait. A state governor must take charge and ensure that the territory is calm and secure at every point in time. President Buhari had charged governors to take charge in their domains.

Remarkably, Kogi State which is adjacent to Benue had earlier witnessed similar ugly scenes but the governor, Yahaya Bello sat down and fashioned a lasting solution that successfully tamed the regular violence in Kogi. The governor convened a stakeholders meeting involving warring groups, set up a joint committee involving host-communities, farmers and herdsmen with powers to monitor activities and control excesses to prevent retributive or retaliatory violence which usually escalates losses in the area.

With the joint committees in place, any person be it from the host-communities, farmers or herdsmen that violate the rules will be sanctioned and made to pay for damages after evaluation by the committees. Among the rules is that if a cow enters a farm and cause any damage, the farmer is expected to report to the committee, and not to retaliate by attacking the cows or herdsmen. As soon as the committee establishes the allegations, the damage will be evaluated for the owners of the cows to pay to the farmers without delay. By this mechanism, anyone taking laws into his hands from any sides will also be sanctioned accordingly. And it has worked excellently.

Instructively, former US President, Ronald Reagan once said, “Peace is not absence of conflict, it is the ability to handle conflict by peaceful means”. Similarly, an American political theorist, Saul Alinsky said, “Change means movement. Movement means friction. Only in the frictionless vacuum of a nonexistent abstract world can movement or change occur without that abrasive friction of conflict.” Likewise, Lawrence Butler, a US Ambassador to the Republic of Macedonia from 2002 to 2005 in a remark said, “If war is the violent resolution of conflict, then peace is not the absence of conflict, but rather, the ability to resolve conflict without violence.”

Putting these remarks together, they point to one direction – conflict is inevitable in human existence, and occurs in all levels of human society – at home, across ethnic groups, business relations, amongst others. In other words, it’s difficult to eliminate differences considering that each person has his thoughts in all cultures, races and societies.

Suffice to say that oversights of Benue government in controlling the conflicts amounts to weakness and a failure of the administration. It makes no sense that people that elected the leaders are frequently sent to their early graves and the governor who is the chief security officer of the state only stands by to attack the president as if the dead bodies can be revived afterwards with the blusters. The constitution proactively empowers governors with security votes.

Perceptively, it has become a pattern of politicians particularly public office holders that are bereft of ideas to resort to verbal attacks to divert attentions. This was abundantly witnessed during the tenure of Ayo Fayose as Ekiti governor. All that the people got from the administration was name-calling – ‘clueless, damaged brain’, or whatever came to his mouth and mind. No significant impact or accomplishments for the state throughout the period.

Again, many have called for absolute ban of open-grazing on account it is antediluvian and promotes ethnic crisis in the society. Admitted, that’s a good idea and supports civilization. However, it can realistically succeed by gradual process and not immediate ban as cattle-rearing has existed for centuries and become a livelihood to some persons. Some grew up as herders, thus, instant ban without adequate planning and reorientation may not succeed considering that herders are nomadic; moving with cattle from one location to another through the bush without even knowing when they cross boundaries.

In other words, Bello’s approaches in establishing ethnic-based conflict resolution committees in Kogi for a lasting peace between host-communities and herders are worthy of emulation. The attacks against presidency cannot birth a solution but escalate the crisis. Ortom must therefore strategically change approaches for a lasting peace in Benue. Ditto for Plateau and other states constantly facing ethnic and religious crisis that always results to bloodbath. People’s lives matter.

Umegboro, ACIArb is a certified arbitrator is a public affairs analyst