CISLAC Wants Dirty Money Stamped Out in Politics
In Nigeria, the ever increasing problem of dirty money in politics, which suggests a high level of impunity among politically exposed individuals, who seek to gain power and accrue wealth through illegal means with zero accountability, has been a growing concern. Worried by this trend, Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC) and other stakeholders recently converged on Lagos at a forum themed “Strengthening Accountability Networks Among Civil Society (SANCUS) to sentisise the public on this menace. Hamid Ayodeji reports
As the 2023 General Elections draws closer, the need for all stakeholders to unite in stamping out money laundering and circulation of other dirty monies’ which births different electoral malpractices was the focus at a workshop organized by CISLAC.
“Strengthening Accountability Networks among Civil Society (SANCUS) is a project that runs from January 2021 to December 2023 and is being implemented by Transparency International Secretariat through its chapters in 21 countries with support from the European Commission.
CISLAC is currently implementing this project in Nigeria, with the focus on solving the core problem of dirty money in Nigeria’s politics, which perpetuates a culture of lack of accountability and corruption for power preservation and self-enrichment. The project aims to improve the democratic accountability of public institutions globally by empowering CSOs to demand systemic change to address accountability and anti-corruption deficits.
The well attended forum held at Regent Hotel, Ikeja Lagos had participants and representatives from the civil society organizations, the media, Inter – Governmental Action against Money Laundering in West Africa – GIABA, Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU) and National Orientation Agency (NOA).
Reeling out the aims of the gathering, the conveners said the
Reeling out the aims of the gathering, the conveners said the SANCUS objective “is to advocate the operational independence of anti-corruption agencies, an increased enforcement of existing anti-money laundering provisions and policies; an improved oversight function of the National Assembly; improved capacity of the media and civil society to investigate the presence of dirty money in Nigeria’s political processes and finally to increase citizens demand for accountability in the funding of political processes.”
The conveners are hoping that the sensitization would instill some level of sanity in the Nigerian political elites whose actions continue to tarnish the good image of the country as a democratic space which operates within the purview of maximum respect for the rule of law.
Stating why the gathering became imperative, the conveners said “Nigeria is the largest Illicit Financial Flows offender in the continent with about $18 billion estimated to be lost annually.” This figure they believe is likely to increase, if necessary, measures are not taken to curb the excesses of these crimes.
Therefore, the forum shared the overview and expected outcomes of the SANCUS project with the CSOs and ways to strategically align the SANCUS with the existing interventions of the AML-CFT CSO forum to have a more robust advocacy towards the strengthening of Nigeria’s AML regime
In his opening remarks, Executive Director, CISLAC Auwal Musa Rafsanjani expressed concerns about the enforcement of laws enacted to tackle money laundry, corruption and electoral malpractice: “Our laws are not enforced or are ignored. According to the widely shared public opinion, political contests have little to do with ideas but rather corruption and populism take the upper hand.”
He said this crisis of the image of Nigerian politics had led to a widely disillusioned public electorate that expects profiting from the corruption instead of trying to stop it.
Rafsanjani noted that although there was crisis at the leadership of the country, the people are equally guilty. Citing the 2019 general elections, he said over one quarter of voters came to the polling stations with the offer to sell their vote to the highest bidder.
The CISLAC Executive Director adds: “We all know the problem IFF causes and as CSOs working around the themes of money laundering there is a need to call out the wrongdoings of the government as well as commend the government when they are taking the right actions.
“Doing this will greatly reduce IFF in Nigeria and you agree with me that with the high rate of borrowing, it is important for us to block these leakages.
“All hands must be on deck to ensure that scenarios where looted funds are stashed either at home or abroad only to be used when it is time for political campaigns and elections is reduced to its barest minimum.”
Speaking about the project, Rafsanjani said SANCUS project comes to Nigeria at the critical junction of the pre-election period for the 2023 elections, as there was a need for all CSOs to unite and come up with strategies aimed at mitigating the role of dirty money in the upcoming electoral circle, and also develop a strategic document for CSOs on how to advocate for a reduction of dirty money in politics.
“On the positive side, the necessary institutional and legal infrastructure is in place. We have the Independent National Electoral Commission and laws in place that, in theory, should regulate how money enters politics,” he said.
Rafsanjani equally noted that the SANCUS project plans to advocate for the operational independence of anti-corruption agencies, an increased enforcement of existing anti-money laundering provisions and policies, and an improved oversight function of the National Assembly.
He said it would also advocate for an improved capacity of the media and civil society to investigate the presence of dirty money in Nigeria’s political processes and, “increase citizen’s demand for accountability in the funding of political processes. On his part, representative of Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU), Moses Azege noted that non-state actors play a unique role in supporting state actors in such ways that result in more effectiveness in our democratic efforts. According to him, these collaborations result in innovative concepts like the theme of SANCUS Nigeria Project, “which is to address the issue of dirty money in Nigeria politics.”
Azege adds: “This initiative could not be more timely bearing in mind that we are about to begin another electioneering process and we know that electioneering is expensive on the ordinary Nigerian because more corrupt proceeds tend to flow into the electioneering space.
“Corruption is not just a threat in itself but an enabler of other illicit conducts. Consequently, the motivation for corruption is more widespread during the period leading to elections. Therefore, all stakeholders have to be alert to this and collaborate in ways that will mitigate these illicit flows.”
While speaking virtually on dirty money in politics, two resource persons joined the discourse from abroad. They were Matthew Jenkins, SANCUS Policy Lead, Transparency International, Berlin, Germany and CISLAC Policy Consultant, Vaclav Prusa.
On how to fight the illicit money, Prusa said the institutions of government should be built in a way that, in fighting dirty money in politics, there will be nowhere for the culprits to hide: “It should be built in a way that there will be no secrecy of jurisdiction, no anonymous companies, every company must be clearly identified and their owners known, just like the idea of hiding under cryptocurrency to perpetrate the act should not be allowed.”
On what the CSOs and others can do to fight dirty money in politics, he said: “They are to monitor compliance, monitor campaign, political spendings, follow up money in politics, press for the fulfillment of anti-corruption pledges, educate the public about political integrity, expose unexpected wealth of Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs), and mobilise critical mass of people who reject dirty money politics.”
Also speaking during the forum, Director Legal, National Orientation Agency, Amina Elelu-Ahmed explained that the issue of dirty money in Nigeria’s politics, with its attendant negative consequences, was no doubt a threat to good governance.
Elelu-Ahmed adds: “It is also no longer news that politics in Nigeria, perhaps more than other avenues, is a leading means of money laundering. Many see political parties as avenues for investment, by money bags, with an expectation for return on investment and therefore would never be guided by the rules of accountability and transparency in governance.
“It is in this regard that I think a deeper look should be taken on sources of funding that those present themselves for political positions spent during elections.”
She said it was necessary for the Code of Conduct Bureau, the EFCC, and others to investigate people aspiring to contest various positions, “so that patriotic Nigerians driven by the passion to serve are not schemed out by those in positions of dirty money.”
Nothing that it was also necessary for political parties to consider reducing the huge amount paid for nomination forms and money spent during elections, so that it would not be beyond reach of those ordinary persons who have interest of Nigeria at heart, as this will drastically discourage dirty money laundered into politics.
Speaking on the issue of dirty money in politics, representative from Inter Governmental Action Against Money Laundering in West Africa (GIABA), Timothy Melaye noted that Nigeria loses billions of dollars as a result of money laundering activities.
He urged that individuals holding public office positions to refuse bribes and partake in corrupt activities.
According to him, “we don’t want dirty money in politics and whatever clean money we have in, it should be controlled. Dirty money should not be reduced. It should be out.”
He said if dirty money was not stopped from coming into politics, owners of the dirty money will be the ones that will win election and rule over everyone: “But the point is, even the clean money should be regulated. This is because, if you put N2 billion in contesting election, after you have won, you will take your money back. So, even if you have clean money, it should still be within treasury.”
