UBA, APC AND THE ANAMBRA ELECTION

The Anambra governorship election has come and gone, and as expected, a winner and losers emerged. Prof Charles Soludo of All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) polled a total of 112,229 votes to emerge a winner. Other frontline contestants are Valentine Ozigbo of Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) who polled 53,807 votes; Andy Uba of All Progressives Congress (APC) polled 43,285 while the fourth position went to Ifeanyi Ubah of Young Progressives Party (YPP) with 21,261 votes. In geographical spread, APGA captured 19 out of 21 local government areas while PDP and YPP captured one LGA each. APC ended up as a floating party in Anambra with no LGA to perch or lay claim to as it didn’t win any. Having met the requirements vis-à-vis the 1999 Constitution as amended and the Electoral Act, the Returning Officer for the poll, Professor Florence Obi, Vice Chancellor of University of Calabar returned APGA’s candidate. Prof Soludo as ‘elected by Anambra people’.

However, one striking development that may not be forgotten easily that characterized the 2021 Anambra governorship poll is the massive number – 230,201 votes the APC candidate, Andy Uba reportedly ‘polled’ during the party’s primary to defeat other aspirants. At the APC primary, records showed that a total of 348,490 Anambra-APC members voted for respective aspirants. But at the governorship poll, total votes cast from the 21 local government areas in the state were 249,631 while total accredited voters were 253,388. This implies that the number of APC members from Anambra that ‘congregated and nominated’ Andy Uba as the party’s standard-bearer outnumbered the total number of all the voters during the governorship election. Maybe, explanations on their whereabouts during the election would suffice.

Incidentally, while all other contestants have described the election as credible and transparent, APC rejected the results claiming the party was rigged out by APGA. On account of the allegations, APC didn’t show up to sign the result sheet after the supplementary poll at Ihiala LGA which was rescheduled by the Commission over alleged security threat. The Anambra APC forgot that President Muhammadu Buhari has repeatedly vowed that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) under his watch must give Nigerians free, fair and transparent elections, and assured that no one would interfere with the sacred mandate of the people. During the Edo election, the Presidency’s neutrality manifested clearly and President Buhari was extolled as a statesman.

On Ihiala supplementary poll, believably, some INEC officials in connivance with some politicians attempted to play out a script by deliberately reserving Ihiala local government area for a separate election after testing other LGAs. Possibly, the plotters had expected that the frontliners’ scores would be close so that a barbaric politics would be deployed at the reserved battle ground. Unfortunately, APGA had a very wide margin that couldn’t easily be maneuvered by any means. With APGA’s margin and geographical spread, it became difficult to frustrate the mandate of the people through any form of electoral malpractices. Although, whatever intrigues, conspiracy or schemes eventually didn’t succeed in Anambra, repetition in future elections is unacceptable. Instructively, an election can only be rescheduled with a credible reason, and not rescheduling part of a poll meant to take place concurrently to a later date using veto power after announcing some results.

Had it been the machines malfunctioned, it would be a genuine reason for not conducting the election in some polling units, but not for a whole town let alone a local council. To reserve an entire LGA, a non-violent and peaceful one as Ihiala LGA suggests some attempted foul play. In Anambra State, there are towns that could be said to have such a peculiarity like Onitsha, Aguleri, Umuleri, and some parts of Awka. But not Ihiala town or towns that make up the Ihiala LGA.

The danger if INEC had concluded the poll, looking at the APGA’s wide margin and geographical spread without rescheduling a poll for Ihiala LGA is that a desperate candidate may try out Hope Uzodinma’s style in Imo State and claim at the tribunal that the omitted LGA was his votes. With the Supreme Court’s precedent set in Uzodinma’s case, who knows, through technicalities, the court may calculate the figures and add to the claimant’s votes as witnessed in 2020. So, INEC must ensure that it doesn’t submit to biddings of desperate politicians in discharging its duties.

Carl Umegboro, ACIArb, is a social crusader