Let Abiodun Examine Your Documents, INEC, Tribunal Tell Adebutu
James Sowole in Abeokuta
The Election Petition Tribunal sitting in Abeokuta, the Ogun State capital, on the complaints emanating from March 18, 2023, governorship election yesterday asked the legal team of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its candidate, Hon Ladipo Adebutu, to allow the legal team of the All Progressives Congress (APC) and the INEC to scrutinise documents that they want to tender to the tribunal before tendering such to the panel.
The tribunal’s directive followed an attempt by the petitioners’ legal team to present over 8,000 documents to the panel to prosecute its case.
The Chairman of the three-man panel, Hon Justice Hamidu Kunaza, gave the directive following objections of the respondents’ counsel to attempt by the petitioners’ team to tender the documents as evidence for the prosecution of their case.
At the resumption of the hearing, counsel to PDP and Adebutu, Godwin Uche (SAN), stated the readiness of his team to formally commence trial immediately, adding that they have filled the list of their schedule of documents before the panel, and have also physically brought all the said documents before it.
Consequently, the counsel to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), which is the first respondent, Remi Olatumura (SAN), in his objection on the point of law, cautioned the move to commit such blunder, as he said, while his team was ready to move on with the case, it is always imperative for the petitioner to have shown the documents to all the parties before then, insisting that he had not seen the document for authentication.
Olatumura further said he owes his client the duty to confirm and certify that those documents actually emanated from INEC, and accordingly scrutinise it.
In the same vein, counsel to the second respondent(Governor Dapo Abiodun), Kehinde Ogunwunmiju (SAN), stated that going by the volume of the documents and in line with procedure rules, which remain always sacrosanct, the over 6,000 documents ought to have been presented from the bar earlier for the benefit of the parties to view and confirm its validity.
Ogunwunmiju also informed the tribunal that the PDP’s counsel had accordingly followed the procedure rules in a similar case involving the duo in Ebonyi State, but decided to act otherwise in Ogun State.
He stressed that the parties needed more time to check and authenticate the documents, arguing that 24 hours might not be feasible and realistic to scrutinise the voluminous documents, as he also called for the list of witnesses at least 24 hours before the commencement of the case, “in which PDP also failed to comply.”
Corroborating the positions of the counsel to the first and the second respondents, Kunle Kalejaiye (SAN), who represented the third respondent (APC), submitted that: “We have to look at the documents. The tribunal has the responsibility to ensure that the needful is done. These are very serious and strategic documents. They should have invited us to come and view them.
“I adopt the submissions of the first and second respondents accordingly that all the undisputed documents should be admitted from the bar. For documents to be undisputed, such must have been seen by all parties involved in the case. These documents have been sought for many months. We should not be railroaded to the admittance of documents. I urge Your Lordship to give us reasonable time to inspect them.”
He subsequently prayed the court to grant two days’ leave for proper scrutiny of the documents.
Ruling on the arguments, the Chairman of the tribunal, Hon. Justice H.N. Kunaza, agreed with the respondents’ counsel.
The tribunal said: “We cannot force them to admit documents they have not seen. All of you should look at the documents.”
The tribunal’s chairman, therefore, granted the parties two days to thoroughly scrutinise the documents accordingly, as the case was adjourned till July 6 for the continuation of the hearing.
