Alleged $6.2m Fraud: EFCC’s Witness Admits not Carrying Out Forensic Examination on Emefiele’s Signature

Alex Enumah in Abuja

A forensic expert and witness of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Mr Bamaiyi Mairiga, yesterday admitted he did not carry out any forensic examination on the signature of the former Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Mr Godwin Emefiele, who is being tried by the federal government over an alleged $6.2 million fraud.

Mairiga, made the admission under cross examination by Emefiele’s lawyer, Mr Mathew Burkaa (SAN).
Emefiele is standing trial on an alleged 20-count amended charge preferred against him by the office of the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF).
He was alleged to have engaged in criminal breach of trust, forgery, conspiracy to obtain by false pretence and obtaining money by false pretence, when he served as the apex bank’s boss.

Among the allegations was that the former CBN boss forged a document titled: “Re: Presidential Directive on Foreign Election Observer Missions dated January 26, 2023 with Ref No. SGF.43/L.01/201” and purported same to have emanated from the office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (AGF).
However, at the resumed trial on Thursday, the witness who is the sixth to be called by the prosecution, presented the report of the Forensic Document Examination (FDE) carried out on the signatures of former President Muhammadu Buhari and former Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF) , Mr Boss Mustapha.

According to him, his forensic examination was limited to only Buhari and Mustapha.
He explained that he did not carry out the forensic examination of Emefiele’s signature because the EFCC did not submit it to him, adding that he did not know why the defendant is standing trial.
The court session went thus:
Question: Do you know the defendant?
Answer: I read about him in the media…..my job is limited to the analysis of documents given to me.
Question: When you were analysing, is it your testimony that you didn’t know you were analysing Buhari and Mustapha’s signature?
Answer: I knew I was analysing Buhari and Mustapha’s signature.
Question: you only analysed signature of Mustapha and Buhari in FDE?
Answer: Yes.
Question: You did not examine Emefiele’s signature?
Answer: No.
He also admitted that the request for the forensic document examination was made by the operatives of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
The proceedings continued: Question: Were they the ones who pointed out the disputed signatures or you determined it on your own?
Answer: The submitting authority.

Earlier, Mairiga informed the court that the signature of Buhari and Mustapha were forged in two separate letters used to facilitate the withdrawal of $6.2 million from the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN).
Led in evidence by prosecution lawyer, Mr Rotimi Oyedepo (SAN), the witness stated that he analysed documents carrying the “disputed signature” and the “specimen signature”, in order to identify individual characteristics present or absent in each of the signatures.

“Signatures were compared to establish similarities or dissimilarities”, he said, adding that “to verify the entire process, data analysis was carried out using other methodologies” as well as a peer review of the report and analysis by another expert, so as to validate it in terms of reproducibility.
He added: “Conclusion from the analysis revealed that the disputed document showed evidence of forgery and copying as the same movement in formation and the skill of execution were found to be different from that of the specimen signature.
“This is a confirmation that the author of the specimen signature marked B -B1, did not write the signature of Muhammadu Buhari on the disputed document marked X”.

He said findings on the document relating to Mustapha also showed that he did not sign the disputed document.
At the end of his evidence, Mairiga went ahead to tender the said documents used in the forensic analysis which were admitted by the court as exhibits.
Sources however wondered why Emefiele’s signature was not sent for forensic examination given that he was the first to raise alarm after meeting with a Special Investigator, Mr Jim Obazee, that his signature had been forged.

Recall that Obazee had late last year claimed that video footages showed Emefiele and Mustapha dragging $6.2 million cash from the vault of the CBN.
The findings by Obazee subsequently led the federal government to amend the criminal charge against the former CBN boss before Justice Hamza Muazu of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).

Emefiele in the amended charge was alleged to have, on February 8, 2023 knowingly obtained by false pretence, $6,230,000.00 by falsely representing that the Secretary to the Government of the Federation vide a letter dated January 26, 2023 with Ref No. SGF 43/L.01/201 requested the CBN to provide a contingent logistic advance in the sum of $6,230,000 “in line with Mr. President’s directive.”