Latest Headlines
As Saraki, Abdulrazaq Battle for the Soul of Kwara
It’s been said that when two elephants fight, it’s the grass that suffers. In Kwara State, the two giants at odds are Bukola Saraki and Governor Abdulrahman Abdulrazaq. Their ongoing political battle has captured the attention of many, but the real question is: who is paying the price?
Saraki, a former Senate President, has criticised Abdulrazaq for demolishing structures across Ilorin. One recent example was the Crystal Place Mall, which was taken down despite being a major business hub. According to Saraki, this demolition reflects a petty, anti-people agenda.
Abdulrazaq, on the other hand, insists that his actions are part of an urban renewal plan for Ilorin. He argues that many properties, like the ones Saraki criticises him for, were dubiously acquired during Saraki’s tenure. The governor claims he’s simply reclaiming public land.
The two men’s rivalry runs deep, and their public jabs only intensify the tension. While Saraki accuses Abdulrazaq of launching a personal vendetta, the governor maintains that this is about restoring order and fairness. Meanwhile, the people of Kwara watch as their city becomes the battleground.
The stakes are high in this feud. Abdulrazaq has openly targeted properties associated with Saraki’s allies, which has fuelled accusations of political bias. Yet, the governor shows no signs of backing down, determined to reshape the state’s capital and, as some have noted, pinch Saraki until he tears off eight pounds of flesh, one for every year he is governor.
For the people of Kwara, the fight between these two political heavyweights leaves them questioning the true priorities of their leaders. Shouldn’t governance be about the people, not political grudges? While these two clash, ordinary citizens bear the consequences, however light they are.
Both Saraki and Abdulrazaq have legacies to protect, but the future of Kwara should not be caught in the crossfire. Will they eventually put aside their differences and focus on leadership, or will the people continue to see governance as a byproduct of their feud?